Thursday, January 23, 2014


Right here in our own back yard:

Whoa.  Yep, that's it.  Just...whoa.

Would I pay for a ticket to The Schlitterbahn just to experience this?  Mmm, probably not.  If I'm there anyway would I go on it.  Mmm, I think so...

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Ingenious Advertising

Whether you know it or not, social media is doing a whole lot to modify the face of our society.  General communication, customer service, "viral" growth, and entirely new pathways of marketing are just some of the more obvious ones.  And, fortunately for the amusement of all of us, it enables things like this:

While we're looking at clever advertising, I really like this one by a leather goods company called Saddleback Leather:

Appropriate snark?  Check!  Proper differentiation between the genuine product and the knock-off?  Check!  Tongue-in-cheek humor?  Check!

Well done, I say!

Thursday, January 16, 2014

Heads Up, Liberty Residents - Highways Are Closing Tonight!

Commuters and travelers beware: A 240-ton transformer will descend on the Northland, shutting down highways for a time on Thursday evening and Friday morning.

No, it's not a boy's "Transformers" toy come to life: Kansas City Power & Light is moving a transformer to help power the Kansas City area.

Moving it will require closing sections of several highways: Interstate 35, Interstate 435, Missouri Highway 152 and U.S. Highway 169. The work will close the roads for an unspecified amount of time starting at 7 p.m. Thursday, according to a release from theMissouri Department of Transportation.

The 480,000-pound power transformer will move from Liberty to a substation near Smithville. Crews will use two tractors and a 36-axle trailer to pull the load. The 18-foot-tall, 195-foot-long transformer will require crews to use opposite lanes and, at times, cross the median.

MoDOT will restrict highway access to establish median crossovers, adjust traffic signals and raise overhead utility lines. The transformer will start its move about 11 p.m. Thursday and should be done by 7 a.m. Friday, the release said. Edwards Moving & Rigging Inc., an oversized item transportation company from Shelbyville, Ky., will handle the move.

MoDOT expects I-35 from Highway 152 to Missouri Highway 291 will close for as long as an hour, and I-435 between Highway 152 and U.S. 169 could close for as long as four hours. Drivers can bypass the closings via detours along 152 and 169.

Yeah, it'll be a pain in the neck, but I'm kinda curious to check it out.  After all, how often do you have the chance to see a 36-axle trailer hauling something that weighs 480,000 pounds?

Wednesday, January 15, 2014

Covet Alert! Covet Alert!

It's just!!!

2015 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 front


Hit the link above for more glorious pictures and all the juicy details of the new 2015 Corvette Z06.

And someone bring me a paper bag, I think I'm hyperventilating...

Friday, January 10, 2014

The Polar Vortex And Other Environmental Stupidity

The latest climate change hysteria is all about the "polar vortex" and how humanity is destroying the planet and thus ruining the polar vortex which is what is bringing us all these horribly cold temperatures, snows, and ice storms.  This is the perfect moment to illustrate yet again how blaming climate change on humanity is not at all a real problem but rather a manufactured non-crisis designed to push an agenda.  Case in point:


Forty years later we have a literal full circle, even down to the same terminology being used by the same liberal "news" organization!  It is also interesting to note that the remedies for global cooling are almost identical to the remedies for global warming.  Bigger government, more regulations, penalties for particular "violations," more intrusion into the private lives of citizens, and so on.  It's another call for bloated government at its finest.  Hmmm...

While we're talking about polar ice in 2014, we shouldn't forget this Al gore gem from 2008, who quoted a big name climatologist that there was a 75% chance that all of the polar ice caps would by gone within five years (we'll pause for a moment to let the liberals carry the one before moving on).  Gore modified the speech in 2009 to either 5-7 years (i.e. 2014-2016)...or 2030.  Um, okay, that's some interesting math.  Regardless, if the track record is anything to go by, he'll be proven wrong again.  The real question is: why does anyone bother to listen to this guy anymore?

Sadly, they do.  In fact, there's been round after round of polar ice panic, and the latest one happened just recently.  The only problem is that the polar ice caps aren't cooperating with the panic:

Data from Europe's Cryosat spacecraft suggests there were almost 9,000 cu km of ice at the end of this year's melt season.

This is close to 50% more than in the corresponding period in 2012.

This means there is not only more surface area of ice this year, but also more volume of ice altogether (which is a distinction that climate change alarmists love to talk about).  They're shocked, naturally.  Good climate change alarmists will still assert that even this amount of ice is far less than most of the previous 30 years.  That's true.  That sort of up/down thing tends to happen at regular intervals in a natural cycle.  You know, like this one:[1]
Okay, enough mocking demonstration of absurdity.  What's the point of this post?  It is this: humanity is not causing climate change.  It's called seasons.  It's called cycles.  It's called nature.  There is absolutely no reason to panic about this, and there is absolutely no reason to implement economically devastating reforms that will ruin the lives of millions of real people in the name of a non-existent non-crisis.  And yet, that is precisely what climate change alarmists are declaring needs to be done if we are to save the planet.

Want an easy example?  Did you realize that incandescent light bulbs are now illegal to produce, and therefore will be disappearing from store shelves in the next few months?  Say goodbye to light bulbs that cost less than a buck, provide clean natural light, and are easily disposable.  Thanks to our betters in Washington, we are now stuck with crappy, sickly light from bulbs containing hazardous materials like mercury (that literally require a hazmat crew to clean up if they break) and cost several dollars per bulb.  This isn't an Obama thing - this all began in 2007 under George W. Bush, and with lots of help from plenty of Republicans.  The bottom line here is that this is an example of big government intruding into the lives of citizens, and it's all based on the myth of man-made climate change.  Sure, light bulbs aren't that expensive, and won't devastate anyone (except maybe the thousands of people who used to work in light bulb factories).  But it's a very attainable example that illustrates the larger point about how rampantly out of control the lust for power and control is in our government.  Light bulbs don't cost much, but what about every kilowatt of electricity you use in your entire house in a year?  What if prices "skyrocket" as Barack Obama promised would be the result of his environmental policies back in 2008?  America gets roughly 50% of its electricity from coal, and the EPA has been busy hammering the entire industry with costly regulations and harsh penalties for "excessive" pollution ever since.  The same policies are also being applied to other energy industries.  If you think that doesn't affect you, you must not be paying your own bills.  Energy prices have already gone up, but if Obama's energy policies -- driven largely by climate change alarmism -- continue it will get much, much worse.  There's a reason Europe pays $11 for a gallon of gas, and it's because they've bought the climate change freak-out hook, line, and sinker.  Obama is trying to push America in the same direction.  Even this is just one more example of the bigger problem.  The principle applies across the board, but nowhere is it easier to blow gigantic holes through the argument than in the area of climate change, where "experts" would have you believe that global warming is responsible for cold temperatures and ice storms, and where predictions of destruction and devastation from things like numerous monster hurricanes are constantly being utterly obliterated by nature itself.  If there wasn't so much at stake, it would be hilarious to watch the self-parody.

It should be noted that liberals have been vacillating between imminent planetary destruction by heat and imminent planetary destruction by cold for well over 100 years!  The only thing they're absolutely certain of is that humanity is the cause of it.  No doubt about that whatsoever, evidence be damned.

I will gladly claim the label of denier.  Denier of hysteria, denier of the absence of logic, denier of willful obliviousness, and denier of the obvious agenda-driven myth of man-made climate change (either hot or cold).  Sign me up.

Thursday, January 9, 2014

Did T-Mobile Just Rock The Mobile World?

Let's hope so! (link)

T-Mobile termination fee refund

When CEO John Legere joined T-Mobile a year ago, he had a problem: T-Mobile was a distant fourth-place carrier in an industry built to prevent people from switching carriers. Most CEOs would just hire another, younger, prettier T-Mobile girl and cross their fingers. Instead, Legere started knocking down walls. Through a series of calculated announcements, he's trying to upend the entire wireless industry and position T-Mobile on top when the dust settles. And lucky for you, consumers will end up on top too, whether they join T-Mobile or not.

Here's how it works: When you switch from another carrier, T-Mobile will pay up to $350 of your early termination fee, and give you up to $300 for your old phone. Legere believes this will force all carriers to end contracts and ETFs for good.

If the bleeding continues, policies will only get fairer and subscriptions cheaper.

"This isn't an offer; this is a lifestyle," Legere announced in his typically bombastic fashion. "We will never have contracts … We are either going to take over this whole industry, or these bastards will change and we'll still be wildly successful. I'm going to love watching the peckers scream."

T-Mobile's first big Uncarrier move was axing the subsidy most carriers put on phones. When AT&T sells you a$650 iPhone for only $200, they're rolling the real cost of the phone into your monthly service fee. If you break your two-year contract and leave early, they don't get their money back, hence the early termination fees. On T-Mobile, you can pay the full cost of the phone up front, or spread the cost across many months. You get a choice, and it's far more transparent.

The brilliance of Legere's plan is that if he succeeds, we all win. A completely contractless wireless industry is a boon for consumers, far beyond merely being able to change carriers on a whim. Here's why.

Carriers will be in real competition 

In a future where carriers will "pay out" each others' early termination fees to win customers, those fees will eventually disappear altogether. At that point customers will be able to leave a carrier painlessly whenever they're dissatisfied. This means that if carriers don't come up with more consumer-friendly policies, promotions, and service improvements, big guys like Verizon and AT&T stand to lose millions of customers. Even with ETFs, T-Mobile is the fastest growing carrier in the United States now. Throughout 2013, T-Mobile added more customers than anyone else: 4.4 million subscribers. 

T-Mobile termination fee refund 05

Those customers didn't appear out of thin air. Most of them likely left AT&T, Sprint, and Verizon. These carriers have already reacted by offering some half-assed contractless options, and if the bleeding continues, policies will only get fairer and subscriptions cheaper. Faster, better service for less money. This is what the fear of losing customers, or real competition – shepherded by no ETFs – will bring. 

Carriers may stop trying to limit and sell phones 

Without early termination fees and contracts, carriers may also stop holding our phones hostage. Currently, for a phone to make any impact in the U.S., it has to go through a long and expensive appeasement process. Before American carriers will officially offer a model of phone, they force manufacturers to add tons of apps and services, create exclusive models specifically for their carrier, and fiddle with the appearance. 

Even T-Mobile is still guilty of requiring custom phones. The Sony Xperia Z1S is a slightly modified version of the Xperia Z1. It has a new camera app feature, more memory, and T-Mobile asked Sonyto move the location of the headphone jack by an inch. 

The consequences are more expensive phones (the cost of the tweaks gets worked into the cost of the phone) and more consumer confusion. For instance, Nokia's Lumia 920, 925, and 928 are all essentially the same phone, but you can only get the 920 on AT&T, the 928 on Verizon, and the 925 on T-Mobile (and now some other carriers). Which one do you want? Thanks to the fractured U.S. carrier system, you probably have no choice.

Carriers may also stop holding our phones hostage.

Recent moves by the U.S. government now allow customers to unlock their phones and take them to other carriers (we own them, after all). In a world where customers can freely switch carriers, more phones would work across multiple carriers, and be sold more like every other electronic good.

Because they would have to compete for customers, AT&T and other carriers would be incentivized to open up their networks to let you use phones from other carriers. Thanks to the growth of LTE, which has been almost universally adopted across networks, all phones can be compatible with all carriers fairly easily. If you buy an iPhone to use on Verizon, you should be able to use it on T-Mobile, AT&T and Sprint, too.

Because they would have to compete for customers, AT&T and other carriers would be incentivized to open up their networks to let you use phones from other carriers. Thanks to the growth of LTE, which has been almost universally adopted across networks, all phones can be compatible with all carriers fairly easily. If you buy an iPhone to use on Verizon, you should be able to use it on T-Mobile, AT&T and Sprint, too. 

Carriers could still sell phones (lots of them) in their stores, but they wouldn't need to be branded, stuffed with garbage apps and reconfigured. Remember how carriers used to offer their own app stores inside flip phones? The success of Apple's App Store ended that, and now iPhone owners on all networks now have access to the same apps. We're better off with an Apple App Store rather than an AT&T app store, and hardware is heading the same direction. 

Times are a changin' 

"What we're going to do is force the industry to change … I want every customer [to be able to switch]," said Legere. He claims 40 percent of families say they would move if someone paid their termination fees, and 70 percent of individual customers. 

If he's right, then T-Mobile's new plan to pay every other carrier's early termination fees and give customers the ability to trade in phones for cash may change everything – not overnight, but in the years to come. 

With more competition, consumers win. For an industry that has spent more than a decade doing its best to screw customers over and bleed us for money, its exciting to see things moving in a positive direction.


Saturday, January 4, 2014

A Couple Of 2013 Wrap-Up Thoughts

I thought it might be useful to post two of the most important (politically speaking) 2013 wrap-up lists that I've seen.  I think both of these really encapsulate a lot of substantive things that took place during the past year that went vastly under-reported.  Read and be informed for 2014.

President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013 (By Ilya Shapiro at Forbes)
One of Barack Obama’s chief accomplishments has been to return the Constitution to a central place in our public discourse.

Unfortunately, the president fomented this upswing in civic interest not by talking up the constitutional aspects of his policy agenda, but by blatantly violating the strictures of our founding document. And he’s been most frustrated with the separation of powers, which doesn’t allow him to “fundamentally transform” the country without congressional acquiescence.

But that hasn’t stopped him. In its first term, the Administration launched a “We Can’t Wait” initiative, with senior aide Dan Pfeiffer explaining that “when Congress won’t act, this president will.” And earlier this year, President Obama said in announcing his new economic plans that “I will not allow gridlock, or inaction, or willful indifference to get in our way.”

And so, as we reach the end of another year of political strife that’s fundamentally based on clashing views on the role of government in society, I thought I’d update a list I made two years ago and hereby present President Obama’s top 10 constitutional violations of 2013.

1. Delay of Obamacare’s out-of-pocket caps. The Labor Department announced in February that it was delaying for a year the part of the healthcare law that limits how much people have to spend on their own insurance. This may have been sensible—insurers and employers need time to comply with rapidly changing regulations—but changing the law requires actual legislation.

2. Delay of Obamacare’s employer mandate. The administration announced via blogpost on the eve of the July 4 holiday that it was delaying the requirement that employers of at least 50 people provide complying insurance or pay a fine. This time it did cite statutory authority, but the cited provisions allow the delay of certain reporting requirements, not of the mandate itself.

3. Delay of Obamacare’s insurance requirements. The famous pledge that “if you like your plan, you can keep it” backfired when insurance companies started cancelling millions of plans that didn’t comply with Obamacare’s requirements. President Obama called a press conference last month to proclaim that people could continue buying non-complying plans in 2014—despite Obamacare’s explicit language to the contrary. He then refused to consider a House-passed bill that would’ve made this action legal.

4. Exemption of Congress from Obamacare. A little-known part of Obamacare requires Congressmen and their staff to get insurance through the new healthcare exchanges, rather than a taxpayer-funded program. In the quiet of August, President Obama directed the Office of Personnel Management to interpret the law to maintain the generous congressional benefits.

5. Expansion of the employer mandate penalty through IRS regulation. Obamacare grants tax credits to people whose employers don’t provide coverage if they buy a plan “through an Exchange established by the State”—and then fines employers for each employee receiving such a subsidy. No tax credits are authorized for residents of states where the exchanges are established by the federal government, as an incentive for states to create exchanges themselves. Because so few (16) states did, however, the IRS issued a rule ignoring that plain text and allowed subsidies (and commensurate fines) for plans coming from “a State Exchange, regional Exchange, subsidiary Exchange, and federally-facilitated Exchange.”

6. Political profiling by the IRS. After seeing a rise in the number of applications for tax-exempt status, the IRS in 2010 compiled a “be on the lookout” (“BOLO”) list to identify organizations engaged in political activities. The list included words such as “Tea Party,” “Patriots,” and “Israel”; subjects such as government spending, debt, or taxes; and activities such as criticizing the government, educating about the Constitution, or challenging Obamacare. The targeting continued through May of this year.

7. Outlandish Supreme Court arguments. Between January 2012 and June 2013, the Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Justice Department’s extreme positions 9 times. The cases ranged from criminal procedure to property rights, religious liberty to immigration, securities regulation to tax law. They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited. As a comparison, in the entire Bush and Clinton presidencies, the government suffered 15 and 23 unanimous rulings, respectively.

8. Recess appointments. Last year, President Obama appointed three members of the National Labor Relations Board, as well as the head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, during what he considered to be a Senate recess. But the Senate was still holding “pro forma” sessions every three days—a technique developed by Sen. Harry Reid to thwart Bush recess appointments. (Meanwhile, the Dodd-Frank Act, which created the CFPB, provides that authority remains with the Treasury Secretary until a director is “confirmed by the Senate.”) In January, the D.C. Circuit held the NLRB appointments to be unconstitutional, which ruling White House spokesman Jay Carney said only applied to “one court, one case, one company.”

9. Assault on free speech and due process on college campuses. Responding to complaints about the University of Montana’s handling of sexual assault claims, the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, in conjunction with the Justice Department, sent the university a letter intended as a national “blueprint” for tackling sexual harassment. The letter urges a crackdown on “unwelcome” speech and requires complaints to be heard in quasi-judicial procedures that deny legal representation, encourage punishment before trial, and convict based on a mere “more likely than not” standard.

10. Mini-DREAM Act. Congress has shamelessly failed to pass any sort of immigration reform, including for the most sympathetic victims of the current non-system, young people who were brought into the country illegally as children. Nonetheless, President Obama, contradicting his own previous statements claiming to lack authority, directed the Department of Homeland Security to issue work and residence permits to the so-called Dreamers. The executive branch undoubtedly has discretion regarding enforcement priorities, but granting de facto green cards goes beyond a decision to defer deportation in certain cases.

It was hard to limit myself to 10 items, of course—Obamacare alone could’ve filled many such lists—but these, in my judgment, represent the chief executive’s biggest dereliction this year of his duty to “preserve, protect, and defend” the Constitution, and to “take care that the law be faithfully executed.”

Alas, things may get worse before they get better.

Happy New Year!

While we're on the subject, Hot Air provides a link to a video of law professor Jonathan Turley, who testified before Congress earlier this month, arguing that Obama’s now at war with the rule of law.  It's simultaneously fascinating and horrifying.  Anyway, given Shapiro's list (and remember, that list is just a starter, and could go on significantly longer), it's not hard to understand that sentiment.

Top Five most important events in the Mideast (by Joel Rosenberg)

It was a dramatic year in the Middle East. Here is my list of the Top Five most important events in the epicenter in 2013:

  1. Syrian death toll keeps climbing amidst horrific civil war & chemical weapons use in Damascus.
  2. Iran beguiles West with “charm offense” as it moves closer to the Bomb.
  3. Saudis preparing to purchase Pakistani nuclear warheads.
  4. Egypt’s counter-revolution brings down the Muslim Brotherhood.
  5. Israeli leader declares Bible prophecies coming true in our lifetime.
What follows is a brief explanation of each development and why I believe they are so significant.
1.) SYRIAN DEATH TOLL KEEPS CLIMBING AMIDST HORRIFIC CIVIL WAR & CHEMICAL WEAPONS USE IN DAMASCUS — Far and away, the greatest tragedy and humanitarian disaster in 2013 in the epicenter was the continued implosion of Syria.
A terrible evil has been unleashed. Syria is collapsing. It is hard to imagine putting the country back together any time soon. Indeed, we may be witnessing the beginning of the end of the geopolitical nation-state we have long known as “Syria.”
In August, Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed that chemical weapons had been used in Syria. “What we saw in Syria last week should shock the conscience of the world. It defies any code of morality,” Kerry said. “Let me be clear. The indiscriminate slaughter of civilians, the killing of women and children and innocent bystanders by chemical weapons is a moral obscenity. By any standard, it is inexcusable. And despite the excuses and equivocations that some have manufactured, it is undeniable. The meaning of this attack goes beyond the conflict on Syria itself. And that conflict has already brought so much terrible suffering. This is about the large-scale indiscriminate use of weapons that the civilized world long ago decided must never be used at all, a conviction shared even by countries that agree on little else. There is a clear reason that the world has banned entirely the use of chemical weapons. There is a reason the international community has set a clear standard and why many countries have taken major steps to eradicate these weapons. There is a reason why President Obama has made it such a priority to stop the proliferation of these weapons, and lock them down where they do exist. There is a reason why President Obama has made clear to the Assad regime that this international norm cannot be violated without consequences. And there is a reason why no matter what you believe about Syria, all peoples and all nations who believe in the cause of our common humanity must stand up to assure that there is accountability for the use of chemical weapons so that it never happens again.”

There was a moment when it looked as if the U.S., France and Britain were going to take military action against the Assad regime in Syria. Then President Obama and the Western powers backed down. As the year ends, Assad remains in power.

“Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his security cabinet are mortified by what they are seeing unfold – not in Damascus, but in Washington,” I noted in September. “To be sure, Israeli leaders are concerned but not surprised by the horrific blood-letting that is underway between the evil Assad regime and the demonic forces of al-Qaeda and their radical Islamic partners. But the Israelis are stunned and dismayed by the vacillating, lurching, confused, and chaotic approach to decision-making of President Obama and his top advisers.”

Fortunately, in 2013 we did not see the absolute destruction of the city of Damascus, as foretold by ancient Bible prophecies. Still, interest in those prophecies — notably Isaiah 17 & Jeremiah 49 – grew this year and millions learned about the prophecies that may not have been familiar with them before. This was in part because of my novel, Damascus Countdown, and in part because of media coverage of the prophecies, both positivenegative, and comical.

2.) IRAN BEGUILES WEST WITH “CHARM OFFENSIVE” AS IT MOVES CLOSER TO THE BOMB – The good news in 2013 was that there was no evidence that Iran has yet finished building or deploying nuclear warheads, and war did not break out between Iran and Israel. The bad news is that the West blinked in its effort to derail the Iranian nuclear program, making a Persian Bomb more likely.

In June, Iran held rigged presidential elections. As I noted at the time, 686 candidates registered to run for president, but the regime allowed only eights candidates to actually compete. Then, two of those eight candidates suddenly dropped out of the race. In the end, Iranians had only six candidates to choose from, all of whom were carefully vetted, were deeply loyal to the Ayatollah Khamenei, and were fully committed to advancing Iran’s nuclear program. In the end, Hassan Rouhani was declared the winner. He was certainly no “moderate,” despite what the Western media said. Indeed, this former Iranian nuclear negotiator once boasted about deceiving the West while Iran steadily built its nuclear capabilities. 

What was so stunning and disappointing, therefore, wasn’t that Rouhani launched a “charm offensive” to beguile the West while Iran moved closer to building an arsenal of nuclear weapons. That was fully expected. What was so painful to watch was that the West took Rouhani’s bait — hook, line, and sinker. The Obama administration, along with the rest of the world powers, seemed determined to strike a deal with Iran no matter what the cost. The agreement ostensibly reached in early November was described by the media as “historic,” yet it did not require Iran to stop enriching uranium, or dismantle a single centrifuge, even though economic sanctions on Iran will begin to be eased. What’s more, no sooner was the deal supposedly completed than Iran immediately began to refute the White House as to the substance of the deal. Then, the White House conceded that the agreement with Iran wasn’t actually finished, that there were a number of “technical” details that remained to be ironed out, that no deal had actually been signed in Geneva, and that implementation of the deal — merely an “interim agreement,” at that — wouldn’t begin until early 2014, at the earliest. 

Israeli officials at the highest levels were stunned by how much the U.S. and Western powers gave away in the deal. Several leading Mideast analysts said there were real reasons to worry about the deal. As the year ends, Iran is increasingly close to the point of building not just an operational nuclear warhead but an arsenal of them.
3.) SAUDIS PREPARING TO PURCHASE PAKISTANI NUCLEAR WARHEADS – One of the biggest fears in the Middle East is that if Iran actually gets operational nuclear weapons that this will spark a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Such fears began to be realized in 2013. 

As details emerged of the deal the West cut with Iran, Arab leaders were horrified. They deeply fear a nuclear-armed Iran and have long pressed the White House to do everything necessary to stop this from happening. Now they fear they are being betrayed. “A deal with Iran would be like discovering your partner of many years is cheating on you with someone he or she claims they hate,” a senior Arab official from a U.S. ally in the region told the Wall Street Journal

Then came the news that the Saudis are in the process of purchasing nuclear warheads from Pakistan, so convinced they have become that the Obama administration has no idea how to stop Iran. “Saudi Arabia has invested in Pakistani nuclear weapons projects, and believes it could obtain atomic bombs at will,” the BBC reported. “While the kingdom’s quest has often been set in the context of countering Iran’s atomic programme, it is now possible that the Saudis might be able to deploy such devices more quickly than the Islamic republic….Earlier this year, a senior NATO decision maker told me that he had seen intelligence reporting that nuclear weapons made in Pakistan on behalf of Saudi Arabia are now sitting ready for delivery. Last month Amos Yadlin, a former head of Israeli military intelligence, told a conference in Sweden that if Iran got the bomb, ‘the Saudis will not wait one month. They already paid for the bomb, they will go to Pakistan and bring what they need to bring.’ Since 2009, when King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia warned visiting US special envoy to the Middle East Dennis Ross that if Iran crossed the threshold, ‘we will get nuclear weapons,’ the kingdom has sent the Americans numerous signals of its intentions….Gary Samore, until March 2013 President Barack Obama’s counter-proliferation adviser, has told Newsnight: ‘I do think that the Saudis believe that they have some understanding with Pakistan that, in extremis, they would have claim to acquire nuclear weapons from Pakistan.’”

If that weren’t enough, we began hearing reports that the Saudis are so fearful of an Iranian nuclear arsenal that they have been building a secret alliance with Israel to take military action against Iran if diplomacy fails. “Riyadh has agreed to let Israel use its airspace in a military strike on Iran and cooperate over the use of rescue helicopters, tanker planes and drones,” reported the Times of Israel and the Sunday Times of London. “The Saudis are furious and are willing to give Israel all the help it needs,” said an unnamed diplomatic source.

4.) EGYPT’S COUNTER-REVOLUTION BRINGS DOWN THE MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD — One of the most positive developments in 2013 was a counter-revolution in Egypt that crushed the Radical Islamic leadership of the Muslim Brotherhood.
The rise of the Brotherhood to power in Egypt in 2012 caused darkness to fall on the land.
After more than 22 million Egyptians sign petition calling for President Mohamed Morsi to step down, the Egyptian military mobilized troops and tanks, arresting Morsi and top Muslim Brotherhood leadership, outlawing the Brotherhood, and promising new elections and a new constitution. Morsi and his fellow Radicals had come to power after the fall of President Hosni Mubarak calling for the imposition of Sharia law and new hostilities with Israel. Shortly before being elected in 2012, Morsi had given a speech saying, “The Koran is our constitution. The Prophet Muhammad is our leader. Jihad is our path. And death for the sake of Allah is our most lofty aspiration….This nation will enjoy blessing and revival only through the Islamic sharia [law].” He adds: “I take an oath before Allah and before you all that regardless of the actual text [of the current Egyptian constitution], Allah willing, the text will truly reflect sharia law, as will be agreed upon by the Egyptian people, by the Islamic scholars, and by legal and constitutional experts. Rejoice and rest assured that these people will not accept a text that does not reflect the true meaning of the Islamic sharia as a text to be implemented and as a platform. The people will not agree to anything else.”
  • Perhaps they didn’t truly understand the Brotherhood’s objectives at first, but as the Egyptian people watched Morsi and his team operate, they were horrified by the direction they were being led and they made their voices heard.
  • The region’s oldest Radical Islamic jihadist organization was toppled in 2013 and the military continues to crack down on the Brotherhood.
  • General Sisi is working hard to fight Islamist terrorism, including launching a major series of offensives against terror groups operating in the Sinai Peninsula.
  • The Egyptian military is also fighting arms smuggling into Gaza, which is putting a stranglehold on Hamas, the Palestinian branch of the Brotherhood.
  • An Israeli think tank reports that “Egypt has finally decided to tackle the security threat from the Sinai Peninsula, a region that was nearly under the control of jihadist organizations with links to al-Qaeda and Hamas. The Egyptian army’s ultimate goal is clear: to recover Egypt’s sovereignty in Sinai. In order to succeed in its mission, the Egyptian supreme command understands that it must neutralize Hamas, which it sees as partly responsible for the security situation in Sinai during the last few years. For the first time since it was founded, Hamas is showing signs of panic. Egyptian newspapers quoted Palestinian sources as saying that 90 percent of the smuggling tunnels along the border with Gaza have stopped functioning as a result of Egyptian measures, leading to the potential loss of nearly 40 percent of Hamas’ revenues. With the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt counting its dead by the hundreds and the campaign being waged by the Egyptian army against them far from over, and with its relations with Turkey and Qatar faltering, Hamas has instructed its spokesmen to avoid making any comments about the crisis in Egypt so as not to evoke the wrath of Egyptian army Commander in Chief Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. Since the Egyptian military ousted President Mohamed Morsi in early July 2013, it has embarked on a punitive campaign against Hamas, the self-declared offspring of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
  • Whether Sisi and his generals will be a positive force in Egypt going forward remains to be seen, but for now they have rescued their country from a Radical Islamist nightmare.
5.) ISRAELI LEADER DECLARES BIBLE PROPHECIES ARE COMING TRUE IN OUR LIFETIME“In our time the Biblical prophecies are being realized,” Israel Prime Minister Netanyahu declared before world leaders gathered at the United Nations General Assembly in September. “As the prophet Amos said, they shall rebuild ruined cities and inhabit them,” Netanyahu said. “They shall plant vineyards and drink their wine. They shall till gardens and eat their fruit. And I will plant them upon their soil never to be uprooted again. Ladies and gentlemen, the people of Israel have come home never to be uprooted again.”

Netanyahu also alluded in the speech to the Biblical prophecies of a Persian king named “Cyrus” that would rise up one day and set the Jewish people free from captivity. “The Jewish people’s odyssey through time has taught us two things: Never give up hope, always remain vigilant. Hope charts the future. Vigilance protects it,” Netanyahu said. “Today our hope for the future is challenged by a nuclear-armed Iran that seeks our destruction. But I want you to know, that wasn’t always the case. Some 2,500 years ago the great Persian king Cyrus ended the Babylonian exile of the Jewish people. He issued a famous edict in which he proclaimed the right of the Jews to return to the land of Israel and rebuild the Jewish temple in Jerusalem. That’s a Persian decree. And thus began an historic friendship between the Jews and the Persians that lasted until modern times.”

Isaiah was the Hebrew prophet who prophesied that a great Persian king named “Cyrus” would emerge one day to bless the Jewish people, release them from captivity, send them back to the land of Israel, and rebuild the city of Jerusalem. (See Isaiah 44:28 through 45:13.) 

A Persian king named “Cyrus” did, in fact, emerge to fulfill Isaiah’s prophecies.
  •  See 2 Chronicles 36:22-23 – “Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia – in order to fulfill the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah – the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he sent a proclamation throughout his kingdom, and also put it in writing, saying, ‘Thus says Cyrus king of Persia, “The Lord, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and He has appointed me to build Him a house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Whoever there is among you of all His people, may the Lord His God be with him, and let him go up!”’”
  • See the Book of Ezra – “Now in the first year of Cyrus king of Persia – in order to fulfill the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah – the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia, so that he sent a proclamation throughout his kingdom, and also put it in writing, saying, ‘Thus says Cyrus king of Persia, “The Lord, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and He has appointed me to build Him a house in Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Whoever there is among you of all His people, may His God be with him! Let him go up to Jerusalem which is in Judah and rebuild the house of the Lord, the God of Israel; He is the God who is in Jerusalem. Every survivor, at whatever place he may live, let the men of that place support him with silver and gold, with goods and cattle, together with a freewill offering for the house of God which is in Jerusalem.” (Ezra 1:1-4)
I don’t personally recall a single other Israeli leader in the modern era who has spoken so clearly of the fulfillment of Bible prophecy. Netanyahu’s interest in the Scriptures has been growing significantly in recent years, as I have noted on the blog, and are increasingly pronounced in his public statements. At a speech at the Auschwitz death camp in 2009, for example, Netanyahu declared that the prophecies of Ezekiel 37 — the dry bones of the Jewish people coming back together miraculously to form the State of Israel — had come to pass in his lifetime.

The declaration by an Israeli leader of the importance of the Bible to Jewish lives, and to all humanity, in our modern times should not be underestimated.

During the 2013 Epicenter Conference we held in Jerusalem in July, I noted in my opening message that “amidst the terrible geopolitical crises in Syria and Egypt — and the nuclear threat growing from Iran — the Middle East faces a far greater crisis: the absolute disconnect between the people and the Word of God. Israel and the Middle East is the land where the Bible was written. Yet most of the people in the epicenter have never read the Word of God.” How sad.

Only 16% of Israeli Jews say they ever read the Hebrew Bible known as the Tanakh (the five books of Moses, the prophets and the writings), according to a sweeping survey of Israeli attitudes towards faith conducted by the Guttmann Institute and the Israel Democracy Institute in 2009. The vast majority of Arab Muslims have never even seen a Bible, much less read one. Is there really any wonder then that if the half billion people in this region don’t know God’s Word, that they are not experiencing His peace, much less peace between nations and ethnic groups?